Yoo Sin #s15-19

Non Chang Hon people can stop reading now:)



Yoo Sin 15 -19.



Premise. If you are in a sitting stance and pivot on the balls of the feet you can pivot to a proper walking stance. The foot that would become the lead foot would pivot 45 degrees and the rear foot would pivot at least 20 degrees to reach the no more than 25 degree angle. Pivoting more than this on the lead foot with the accompanying greater pivot of the rear foot would result in the walking stance being too narrow.



Is the above correct or not?



Now, taking this into account we have:



#15 Sitting stance to BD

#16 Walking stance to BC

Foot diagram with single photo shows left foot may have been moved and not just pivot.

Foot diagram below photo series may show just a pivot or it may not.

#17 Sitting Stance to BD

Foot diagram with single photo may show a slight repositioning of right foot - may not.

Foot diagram with series of photos seems to show pivot but could also show left foot change.

#18 Walking stance to AD

Foot diagram with single photo seems to show slight relocation of right foot and pivot with the left.

Foot diagram with series of photos also may show slight right foot re position.



Now, this most definitely seems to be an example of angles where the #s 16 & 18 BC / AD directions are not half way between B&C / A&D . They are just slightly to C / A.



So, the questions are:



Is the above premise correct vis a vis Mac 45 degree pivot from sitting to walking stance for a correct Walking stance?

For moves 15-18 is it pivot only (And if so and you agree with the premise how is the issue of a greater than 45 degree pivot resolved?

Or

Is a foot relocated during the transitions? If so what is / are the repositions.



Yes I need to get a life.